The cycle, I am talking about, is basically a combo of 2 circles. One rolling over the other. Just like that gyroscopic motion example. The inspiration for this 'cycle-nama', I have drawn from my cycle itself.
I never though that cycle will be a gulping one. I thought it as a try. Just like other tries, I started rolling. Oh! sorry, riding. Rolling would be best to use after I have traversed a significant distance. So, essentially riding. I started and continued riding down that 'same' road just to make me ride a cycle. And obviously, on cycle itself. (I have bicycle as my only mode of transportation here).
I start with a fresh mind and full efficiency. I knew the ride is going to be cycle as many researchers say, " One has to do lots of tries, again and again". To my habit of taking things as granted, as such, the habit that has made my thinking an impetus. I, now, love to struggle. It looks good to me when I do struggle. When I fail to not understand something fully. Or maybe partially too. But when I do not get something, it excites me a lot. I essentially work more. But again the same habit comes in between. Let it be. The point I was explaining (to me) is more or less the same as written above. I am loving, as always, the cycle I am riding daily to cycle that important 'cycle' of one's life. Genius, although, doesn't ride that cycle. Probably, he may have some chord (external one) to reach destination. But the common manearcher's problem is the same. You can't get the destination in a cycle. Every point is a starting point. You can call it a ending too. But again at some point, some where else, it is most probable to become an initial point again.
My routine is going the same way too. The manearcher's one. I am not genius, reports and surroundings say. My insight observation too. Quotes say one has to struggle a lot. I accept too. Unintentionally, I am validating it too. All are validating the same common perception. Perception of using gyroscope. Cycling your cycle with your cycle. But, ain't there any way out? To point out the destination and go straight to it. Even if there lies a straight path, it is highly likely that that point is least probable to find out. The precision, likely isn't limited to some minimum value. But I am sure it has some point below which it can't go. And a random manearcher can never reach that point by luck. The circle has billions of points. Thus, the world is not enough if we go by luck. But yes, by struggle and hardwork, there lies some sets of "manearcher turned genius" who are likely to find that point. The point which drives you to some result. The result may itself be in some other circle. Who cares? You are not alone 'genius' there. Your progeny is meant to repeat the same feat. In a more judicial manner.
Thus, that cycle is very important, not because more cycling means more toiling, more output, more close to the result. Instead, cycling means finding out the point. The point where a path exists. The path may even be in nano length dimension(if your points' distance among each other is in micro level). But it's really important to travel those straight lines. Now, it depends on your precision only. The accuracy doesn't really matter. More precise, more closer to the point of interest. Any straight line, a straight indication of some result. Followed by either of these 2 things. First one, to stop and let progeny traverse the next cycle. Second one, to come back and travel the same cycle. But remember, you didn't travel the same cycle only. You discovered that line. Whose final point decided your future action. But whatever may be the situation. You did actually transformed into some fraction of genius. Although, the perfect genius doesn't exist. Same does the reference value of genius, whose fraction you are!
